Regular Meeting                                                     January 26, 2010

The regular meeting of the Millcreek Township Board of Supervisors was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Vice Chairman McGrath in the Assembly Room of the Millcreek Township Municipal Building .  Present were Gerald Wolf, Brian McGrath , Richard Figaski, Evan Adair , Esq., Phyllis Vollbrecht and Richard Morris, P.E.  Mr. Kujawa was absent due to illness.

Following the Pledge to the Flag, Mr. McGrath called for public comment on agenda items other than development or rezoning applications.  No comments were received.

It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve the minutes of the meeting of January 19, 2010 .  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Payment of the weekly General Fund bills in the amount of $37,794.19 was approved on motion by Mr. Figaski, seconded by Mr. McGrath.  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

A public hearing was held on the following subdivisions and land development plans:

David L. and Nancy I. Yanosko.  Subdivision Plan.  A subdivision plan to create a 0.21 acre parcel, Parcel A, located along the east line of Greeley Avenue north of West 32nd Street in Tract 23.

Engineer Morris reported that the Millcreek Township Planning Commission recommended approval.  David Yanosko, 925 Ardmore Avenue , appeared on behalf of the plan.  It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by
Mr. McGrath to approve the subdivision plan.  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Preliminary Plan for Laurel Springs .  Preliminary Land Development Plan.  A modified preliminary land development plan to show an increase of total proposed apartment units to 402 with proposed private roads, located along the south line of West Grandview Boulevard (S.R. 4014) west of West Street in the South Gore Tract  and Tract 348.

Engineer Morris reported that the Millcreek Township Planning Commission recommended approval with the following:

 

Conditions

1.         The developer shall provide a traffic study with a full traffic signal warrant analysis with 24 hour counts for the intersections of
West Grandview Boulevard and West Street and West Grandview Boulevard and Perkins Street .  The traffic study shall be conducted within six months after the full opening of the final phase of the development.  Financial security is to be withheld for the traffic study in the amount as estimated by a P.E. specializing in traffic engineering for the future cost of the study plus 10 percent.

2.         The developer shall provide Township approved financial security in the amount of $60,000.00 plus 10 percent for traffic improvements.

 

Atty. Gary Eiben, McDonald Group, 456 West 6th Street , Erie , PA , appeared on behalf of the plan.  Mike Sanford, Sanford Surveying and Engineering, has primarily been responsible for work on Laurel Springs but could not attend the meeting because of the unexpected death of his father.  The Preliminary Plan was approved for 223 units which they are asking for a modification to approve the maximum of 402 units.  The developer feels this is the best use of the land.  The stormwater has been addressed, as well as screening and mound work.  Atty. Eiben asked the Board to approve the Preliminary Plan without the conditions because they don’t have any basis under Township ordinances.  They will not agree to those conditions at this time.  The plan as presented meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. 

 

Mr. McGrath said that under Section 618 – Submission and Review of the Final Plan applications – it reads that a final plan application must comply and be consistent with the Preliminary Plan approval.  This new Preliminary Plan is not consistent with the prior one and either is the Land Development Plan.  In Section 902 – Prerequisites for Approval – it reads that the proposed development shall not abut or have access on a street deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be insufficient or conditioned to accommodate the proposed development and/or traffic to be generated therefrom and no such development shall be approved.  If the Board feels that the abutting streets cannot handle the additional traffic, it has the opportunity to deny the application.  The Planning Commission recommended that in order to have the nearby streets able to accommodate the additional traffic, some improvements may be necessary.  To determine what the improvements might be would require a traffic study.  If improvements are necessary and money is not held for that, the cost would fall on the taxpayers. 

 

Atty. Eiben does not feel there will be adverse impact upon the abutting streets.  The traffic study already submitted states that the egress traffic due to this development is a minimal increase.  There are existing problems on that corridor.  The traffic study already submitted is a “snap shot” study (two two-hour periods) according to Mr. McGrath.  PennDOT did not think this was sufficient enough to make any type of recommendation.  Engineer Morris said PennDOT requires a full signal analysis involving a 24-hour count.  Atty. Eiben said they have been told much different by PennDOT.  Their traffic study was conducted during peak hours and the Board does not have the factual premise for the finding that this will have an adverse affect so the application should be approved without conditions.   

 

Lilian Saadi, 2001 Charleston Avenue , stated that the residents of Wyngate Subdivision have a hard time now getting out onto West Grandview Boulevard .  Also, people will drive through their subdivision to get to Zimmerly Road to avoid the traffic on Grandview .  They are very concerned about the changes to the first plan.  Now the plan shows two 35-unit buildings further east than the original plan.  Mrs. Saadi said the buildings are now three stories.  The developer changed the building locations behind their homes so they don’t have balconies right in the back yards.  Also, it does not seem logical that this development won’t impact the traffic situation. 

 

Mr. McGrath asked Attorney Adair if the Board has the option to deny as presented or approve with the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.  Attorney Adair opined that if the developer makes the proposal to include a traffic study and contributes proportionately to traffic improvements, the Board could approve it.  The Board has to first conclude that this proposed increase in density would have the impact on the abutting streets that the section of the Subdivision Ordinance sited.  It does not make sense to have a lot of traffic studies at different stages of the development, so either a decent study be presented or the developer meet the demands on improvements to the abutting streets. 

Atty. Eiben said the Board must determine if there is an adverse impact on the abutting roads which there is no evidence to make such a finding.  So, the Board should make their decision in favor.  A denial would have to be based on a finding of an impact on the abutting roads.  He cannot commit on behalf of the developer to conduct a complete traffic study.  He does not see why the developer and the Supervisors cannot agree to extend the period of time and make the final decision on the Preliminary Plan to correspond with the Final Plan.  The applicant has to be the one to waive the time period, in writing, to the Board of Supervisors. 

 

Mr. Figaski reported to Atty. Eiben that because of the elimination of vegetation near the Kearsarge Fire Department at the intersection of West Street and West Gore Road , there is now an excessive amount of drifting in their parking lot.  He asked if the developer could abate that through four-foot mounds and/or six-foot high buffers.  Atty. Eiben agreed to speak with the developer.

 

It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to table action until February 9, 2010 on the Preliminary Plan and Land Development Plan for Laurel Springs – Phase 3A.  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

 

Laurel Springs – Phase 3A.  Land Development Plan.  A land development plan showing the construction of a 52-unit apartment building with associated driveway and parking areas located at the southwest corner of West Grandview Boulevard (S.R. 4014) and West Street in Tract 348 and the South Gore Tract.

            Tabled – see above.

Plan of Relocation of Powell Avenue .  Subdivision Plan.  A subdivision plan to show the relocation of Powell Avenue north from the north end of the existing bridge to the south line of Oxer Road .  Relocated Powell Avenue will bisect three parcels owned by Millcreek Township with Erie County Index 33-46-171-12, 13 and 14 creating three new parcels north of Powell Avenue with the residue along the south line of Powell Avenue becoming integral parts of Erie County Tax Parcel 33-45-154-33.02.  Also creating a 3.262 acre parcel, Parcel B, and an 80.676 acre parcel, Parcel A, all to become parts of the Erie Regional Airport Authority property for the purpose of Runway 6-24 Extension.  Also creating a 2.587 acre parcel, Parcel C, south of relocated Powell Avenue and a 2.233 acre parcel, Parcel D, east of relocated Powell Avenue to be owned by the Erie Regional Airport Authority.  All located east of existing Powell Avenue and south of West 12th Street in Tracts 11, 12, 13, 18, 19 and 20.

 Engineer Morris reported that the Millcreek Township Planning Commission recommended approval with the following:

 

Requirements:

1.        Close roads within Parcel A.

2.         Provide a letter or agreement from PennDOT stating that the closed portion of Powell Avenue shall be dedicated to the Airport.

 

John Camp, C&S Engineers, appeared along with Tyrone Clark, MGC-Erie.  The project consists of extending the existing runway to the east which would sever the existing Powell Avenue .  Powell would then be relocated to connect to Marshall Drive at West 14th Street .  The Airport is purchasing properties in the affected area by the extension and relocation.  The application would combine all pieces purchase by the Airport as well as create the right-of-way for Millcreek Township for the proposed road relocation.  A portion of
Linden Avenue, West 17th Street , Marshall Drive, and West 14th Street will be closed. 

 

Attorney Adair said the Township must file appropriate petitions to close and/or vacate streets.  There are some paper streets there.  He asked if any of the streets to the east, i.e. West 13th, West 14th and Idaho Avenue , are impacted by either the runway extension project or the relocation.  Mr. Camp said there are no proposed improvements in that area that would potentially affect the relocated Powell Avenue , as he knows now.

 

It was moved by Mr. Figaski, seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve the subdivision plan for the relocation of Powell Avenue .  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

 

Runway 6-24 Extension.  Land Development Plan.  A land development plan to show the construction of relocated Powell Avenue, the construction of a cul-de-sac at Marshall Drive and West 11th Street and the extension of Runway 6-24 located east of Powell Avenue south of West 12th Street in Tracts 11, 12, 13, 18, 19 and 20.

Engineer Morris reported that the Millcreek Township Planning Commission recommended approval with the recommendation that the Township and Airport Authority develop a cul-de-sac solution for West 11th Street and Marshall Drive that is best for all parties

 

John Camp and Tyrone Clark appeared on behalf of the Land Development Plan which shows the extension of the roadway to the east, severing the existing Powell Avenue , and constructing a new roadway to tie into the existing Marshall Drive .  The road project includes modification to the existing Riviera Estates flood detention basin and the construction of a cul-de-sac at West 11th Street and Marshall Drive based on several years of concern from the neighbors that existing Marshall Drive becoming a through street.  The plan is to terminate Marshall Drive at the north end of the block just south of West 11th Street . 

 

Mr. McGrath explained that the neighbors made it clear that they did not want to see Powell Avenue between West Lake Road and West 12th street relocated on Marshall Drive and become a through street.  Several different options were reviewed.  One was to close Marshall at West 12th, but the Board wants to put a traffic signal at that intersection which would enable CRI to use that traffic signal.  Also, the homeowners on the east side of Marshall between West 11th and West 12th would have easier access to their homes. 

 

Tyrone Clark indicated that the information they’ve received from the community after a survey was completed was that a cul-de-sac at West 11th and Marshall was the most favorable solution.  Also, a solution needs to be agreed upon with Community Resources of Independence (CRI).  He believes the Land Development Plan should be approved with the condition that they will continue to work with all parties for a cul-de-sac solution. 

 

Wayne Labonte, 630 Clifton Drive , appeared in opposition to the plan.  He is a pilot and believes this extension is a waste of taxpayers’ money, is a security risk for the Airport, and the new Powell Avenue will be continually drifted shut in the winter.  It will not be a safe road to drive.  Consideration should be given not only to Marshall Drive , but streets on either side; Clifton will be affected the most.  Mr. McGrath said the general consensus from the public that utilizes Powell Avenue was that another north/south route is needed, which is the reason the Board fought so hard to maintain another north/south route.  Safety is key for emergency vehicles and school busses. 

 

Atty. Jay Shimek, Quinn Law Firm, appeared on behalf of CRI in opposition to the plan.  CRI has been ignored in the process according to Atty. Shimek even after sending a letter to the Airport in February of 2008 asking to be involved.  In December of 2009 they received notification of the Land Development Plan before the Planning Commission.  CRI’s main reason for opposition is that the proposed cul-de-sac ruins the access to their loading dock. 

 

Carl Barry, Director of Human Resources for CRI, stated that the loading dock is on the northeast corner of their building which is where the cul-de-sac is proposed.  They are a non-profit social service headquartered in Erie that supports people with physical disabilities.  They employ 90 to 100 people in that office.  CRI purchase that building because it is wheelchair accessible and has the loading dock.  Their business would be detrimentally impacted by the proposed smaller than spec cul-de-sac.  He spoke about the lack of communication with the Airport.  CRI agrees about the concern of traffic on Marshall Drive but disagrees that the cul-de-sac is the only solution. 
Mr. Figaski asked about discussions regarding the moving of their loading dock.  Mr. Barry said no one has talked with them about this.  Moving the loading dock to the west side of the building would be prohibitively expensive according to Atty. Shimek because of the internals of the building.  In answer to Mr. McGrath’s question, Atty. Shimek said that a properly sized cul-de-sac would allow a truck to get in from West 12th, turn around, and get out.  The proposed 39-foot cul-de-sac which is less than half of what the Township requires, presents many problems; safety issues, snow removal, and one-third of the delivery trucks would be parked out into the roadway. 

 

Mr. Barry said that CRI receives a delivery every one to two weeks.  A delivery truck sticking out into the cul-de-sac that infrequently would not be a huge concern, but snow is a big concern according to Mr. McGrath.    CRI’s engineers came up with a plan whereby northbound traffic on the new Powell Avenue would turn left or right only at West 12th Street .  In front of those lanes would be a turtle allowing westbound West 12th Street traffic to enter Marshall Drive northbound.  That would prohibit northbound Powell Avenue traffic from entering Marshall Drive .  Southbound traffic from West Lake Road on Marshall Drive would come to a peninsula with signage of “Do Not Enter.”  In order to stop traffic at the physical barriers, a camera enforcement system would be installed at each intersection at a cost of approximately $16,000 per year which would be offset by fines. 

 

CRI wants involvement in planning a solution.  Another suggestion is the corner lot (82’ x 65’) across Marshall Drive from CRI could be purchase by the Airport for use of a properly sized cul-de-sac.  Mr. McGrath said cul-de-sacs are not wanted in the Township unless absolutely necessary.  The plan presented by Atty. Shimek is certainly unique and unless physically prohibited from going around an island, people will do it. 

 

Mr. Figaski feels the cul-de-sac configuration is a mess and so is the new plan.  He’s not sure the new runway is the answer.  He does not have a solution and the cul-de-sac is not the answer.  If one has to be put in, do it the right way.  The developers must go back to figure a plan that is favorable to all those involved.

 

Rachel Farmer, 1103 Marshall Drive, owner of the property mentioned as being purchase by the Airport to make the cul-de-sac, appeared to suggest putting the cul-de-sac at West 10th and Marshall because West 10th only goes east to the cemetery or put four-way stop signs at West 10th and West 11th and Marshall Drive.  The proposed cul-de-sac would take a tree and some property up to her sidewalk.  It would also prohibit her from using Marshall Drive northbound. 

 

Fred Pence, 1109 Marshall Drive, suggested using the whole intersection at West 11th Street and Marshall Drive by using a small amount of property from all four corners.  Mr. McGrath said that has been considered but the Board wants to do what the neighbors feel most comfortable with.  Rather than debating the issue further, a meeting should be held with the neighbors, including CRI, Township officials, and the Airport. 

 

Will Fiddler addressed the Board regarding the runway project.

 

Tyrone Clark agreed to a meeting with the property owners.  He said they attempted several times to contact CRI who did not return their phone calls.  The Airport will send out invitations within the next week.  He believes a solution is forthcoming and asked the Board to approve the Land Development Plan with the condition that the cul-de-sac issued be solved. 

 

Mr. McGrath asked Atty. Adair if the plan could be approved tonight with a condition or would it be better to table.  Atty. Adair opined that the application before the Board includes a major project and the proposed terminus of Marshall Drive north of West 12th Street .  People did not appear tonight for any part of the project south of West 12th Street .  The issue is that all the land must be controlled that is involved in the application, which includes the cul-de-sac.  There are a lot of unanswered questions.  The cul-de-sac was addressed in the 2003 MOU according to Mr. McGrath.  It was noted that no one appeared with a problem of anything south of West 12th Street . 

 

It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to table action until the meeting of February 16, 2010.  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

 

Regarding Ordinance No. 2010-1 to increase the quarterly sewer rental rates from $70.00 to $80.00, Mr. Figaski is unsure if this was done legally.  The rate increase was approved at the December 29, 2009 meeting and residents are already being billed for the increase.  An ordinance is required to make the change.  He is not in favor of the increase and that the people in Millcreek have had enough with the sewer increase and the water issues.  He knows it takes money but at this point, he doesn’t care if the money has to be borrowed, bleed every reserve in the Township, or stand out on the corner with a can.  Alternative forms of billing should be looked at to alleviate the increase.  A flat rate billing is antiquated.  The Township should use a billing system based on water usage which would be fairer for residents.  An 80-year old woman living in a trailer pays $80.00 per quarter for sewer, the same as someone at home with six kids taking two dozen showers per day, doing 20 loads of laundry per week and running the dishwasher twice a day.  He is not in favor of the ordinance.

Mr. McGrath also likes the idea of billing for sewer on the basis of water usage.  The downside is that there is a set amount of money that must be paid to the City of Erie for transportation and treatment which will not change.  Some people obviously will see their sewer bill go down and others will go up.  Based on water usage, in theory, one would pay for what is going into the sewer.  People make the choice to water their lawn, wash their cars, etc. which will make their sewer bills increase. 

Again, Mr. Figaski feels it is a fair way and one pays for what one uses.  Different ways must be looked at to get the Township’s hands out of the people’s pockets.  Mr. McGrath is concerned with the amount to be paid to the City of Erie for improvements to the sewer treatment plant and for the 21 percent increase in transportation and treatment which must be collected from residents.  Mr. Figaski again said that maybe the money would have to be borrowed.  He is not in favor of borrowing and the Township has an admirable history of paying as it goes.  Mr. McGrath does not understand the theory of borrowing money to take the burden off the people because the money will have to be paid back with interest.  Now is the time to force the issue of sewer rates based on water usage according to Mr. Figaski. 

It was moved by Mr. McGrath to approve Ordinance No. 2010-1.  The motion died for lack of a second.

It was recommended by Engineer Morris, moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve the withdrawal of the John Everett Alberstadt Subdivision on East Clifton Drive .  Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

On motion by Mr. Figaski, seconded by Mr. McGrath, the following petition requesting a change in zoning classification was referred to the Planning Commission for consideration:

Scott M. Bonnell, for property located at 2650 West 26th Street , now zoned “B” Business District, asking for a change of classification to “C” Business District.

 

Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Treasurer Wolf reported that Mr. Whitbread reviewed and recommended approval of two contracts with IPLogic for emergency telephone service for the Police Department ($4,683.92 per year) and the Millcreek Township Supervisors ($6,976.46 per year).  It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve the contracts.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

It was recommended by Treasurer Wolf, moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve an amendment to the original contract with New World Systems to release New World from providing separate vendor files and ultimately separate general ledgers. 
New World informed the Township that they would not write the software modifications so additional software and services were negotiated for in its place.  The amendment was reviewed by Thomas Horvath and Barry Baker.  Also, included in the motion was the additional software and services to provide report writing software for four modules; financial management, human resource/payroll, utility billing, and community development, along with eight hours of remote implementation and training at a cost of $1,200.00.  Up to two weeks of on-site training which includes travel expenses relating to street lighting billing at no charge is included.  The Secretary would be authorized to sign the contracts.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

It was recommended by Parks and Recreation Director James Sperry , moved by Mr. McGrath and seconded by Mr. Figaski to approve the following for the 2010 spring season staff:

            Judy Shapiro                   Mah Jon Supervisor                      $  9.00/hour
            Alex Bartlebaugh             MIHS Lifeguard                          $  7.65/hour
            Mark Coursey                 Outdoor Grilling                          $10.00/hour
            Ross Mayo                     Model Airplane Instructor               Volunteer
            Kathy Wiest                    Babysitter Clinic Supervisor             Volunteer
            Joe Logue                      Tuite Supervisor                            Volunteer
            Charlotte Haggerty          Adult Dance Supervisor                   Volunteer

There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Mr. McGrath reported that Garage Foreman William Hitchcock received a quote from Day Ford through the Central Westmoreland COG for a new Ford F550 small dump truck with an 11-foot dump body for the Parks and Recreation Department at the piggyback price of $47,316.00.  This purchase was included in this year’s budget.  It was moved by Mr. McGrath and seconded by Mr. Figaski to approve the purchase.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Because one of the employees offered a position in the Streets Department declined it, Mr. McGrath and Mr. Kujawa conducted interviews to fill the position.  It was moved by Mr. McGrath and seconded by Mr. Figaski to employ Joseph F. Maffeo to fill the open position, effective February 8, 2010, at the appropriate and pending successful passing of a pre-employment physical and drug screening.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

It was moved by Mr. Figaski and seconded by Mr. McGrath to approve a $.42 per hour (3%) increase in rate of pay for the part-time fire inspector and part-time radio dispatchers.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

It was recommended by Engineer Morris, moved by Mr. McGrath and seconded by Mr. Figaski to approve the solicitation of quotations for the removal and replacement of 14 catch basins in the Belle Valley area of the Township.  There being no public comment; the motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.

Sue Weber , 5338 Norris Drive , asked if the person hired for the Streets Department has a CDL.  Mr. McGrath said people are not interviewed for those positions unless they have a CDL.  Since she left the Board of Supervisors six years ago, the sewer rental rates increased 25%.  Now the rates are proposed to be increased another 15%.  This is definitely not the right thing to do.  Both she and Mr. Figaski think sewer rates should be based on water usage.  The idea that everyone should pay a flat rate is ludicrous.  Even the City of Erie changed to sewer bills based on water usage.  For years now, sewer bills for businesses in the Township have been based on water usage.  It is discriminatory to allow businesses to have the sewer bills based on water use but not homeowners, and it is time to change.  All the water a homeowner uses, except for washing cars or sprinkling lawns, goes into the sewer system so that would be an accurate way to pay for sewer.  She said it would not be hard to change.  It does not make any difference what the City is charging for transportation and treatment charges, it would all balance out in the end.  Mrs. Weber does not like the way the increase came about—that it was snuck through just before Christmas, done without an ordinance which is illegal, without advertisement of the ordinance, and then people got the increase in their bills after the first of the year.  She wants those people credited back on their next bill.  She congratulated Mr. Figaski for catching the non-advertisement and enactment of an ordinance and that he demanded an ordinance be drafted and public notice be given.  She said she does not want to pay the same sewer bill as someone with six kids that doing all kinds of laundry, taking all kinds of showers, running the dishwasher.  She told the Board to do the right thing by the taxpayers in this Township.  There are so many progressive cities and townships across the State of Pennsylvania and country that do it by water usage.  Mr. McGrath asked for statistics on this and if she would share them with the Board.  He said this idea should be pursued but an education process will be necessary because the Board will not hear from homeowners with the lower sewer bills but the ones with higher bills will be in here in droves.  Mrs. Weber said those homeowners should be told to learn how to conserve water.  When those people come in, they should be asked if “their grandmother living alone and using hardly any water should be paying the same rate as those with six kids”.  Mrs. Weber said that if you don’t want a higher sewer bill, don’t have six kids, don’t take a lot of showers, don’t run your dishwasher five times a week.  It’s up to the homeowner to conserve water. 

Mr. Figaski stated that he did not catch the ordinance.  However, in order to increase the sewer rate, an ordinance must be passed and it wasn’t.  For so long, flat rate sewer billing was the only way because so many residents had wells.  Now, the majority of the Township does have metered water.  Changing the system of billing is the fair way for the taxpayers.  Mr. McGrath said the reason the City didn’t bill based on water usage was because up until several years, not everyone was metered. 

Lou Arcovio, 3927 Vista Drive , reported that he attended two meetings between the Board of Supervisors and Erie Water Works recently and thanked the Board for the meetings.  The last meeting was very encouraging in that each key point was discussed in detail and it seems that there are not any problems that can’t be solved.  Erie Water Works will submit a new proposal within the near future based on discussions last week.  Regarding representation on the Erie Water Works board, Mr. Arcovio feels is not a huge deal breaker.  A two-tiered water system in the Township is not only not fair, but unnecessary.  In the past five years, it is estimated that the higher-paying water customers have paid more than $7 million than those with Erie water.  Again, he thanked the Board for the progress made to date.

Ronald Kolb, 4101 Vista Drive , urged the Board to make water rates equal for all.  He has some suggestions on the lease of the water system that he would like to discuss with the Board sometime.  He said the Board has a difficult job with hard decisions to make for all citizens.  Mr. Kolb talked about the difficulties between the Millcreek Water Authority and the Erie Water Works. 

Buzz Andreseski, 3102 Wellington Road , appeared and thanked Mr. Figaski for being a “breath of fresh air” in Millcreek Township .  There is no logical reason for higher water rates for some.  Mr. Andreseski said the Board has used its powers as politically elected supervisors to create full-time, well-paying Township jobs for themselves.  So, now as employees, is the Board acting outside the scope of their responsibilities when they discriminate against 7,000 homeowners.  He feels two Board members have spent their time figuring out a way to avoid letting 7,000 people have the same water rate as Erie Water Works customers.  He feels these people deserve money back because there is no rational reason to charge people 30 to 50 percent more.

Gary Behr, 4045 Feidler Drive , told the Board he is one of the 7,000 water customers that have been discriminated against.  Mr. Figaski’s idea of borrowing money is irresponsible.  Mr. Behr said that after working as a police officer in the Township for 31 years, he should have a better grasp, have a plan to present to the public, think before he speaks, and be more responsible.  He is concerned with the employment of the sewer and water department employees.   Mr. Figaski said he offered a plan for the lease of Millcreek’s water system to Erie Water Works, and indicated there are some employees within the Water Authority who will be absorbed by Erie , some will bid in to jobs in the Township in other capacities, some will retire and maybe some will lose their jobs.  Discussion followed on the appointment of Mr. Thiemann to the Millcreek Township Water Authority at the reorganization meeting and the appointment coming up to fill an unexpired term.  Mr. Figaski wants intelligent, regional thinking individuals appointed to these positions and feels these people meet his criteria.  Regarding the Cable Television Advisory Committee, Mr. Figaski informed Mr. Behr that most of the previous members will be re-appointed.  A great deal of work needs to be done by this Committee. Time Warner services everybody within this region, with exception to those with satellite dishes, under 25 separate contracts.  It makes sense to bring these contracts together under one contract to economy scale, drive prices down and services up.  The members are anxious to get to work and in the past, meetings were held on an as-needed basis.  Mr. McGrath said the committee used to meet more frequently but has never been denied the opportunity to hold a meeting.  An attorney from Pittsburgh is willing to speak to the Council of Governments to discuss the issue of renegotiating a contract with Time Warner so input from the Cable Committee is very much needed. 
Mr. Behr again told Mr. Figaski that he is concerned about debt for the Township.

There being no other citizens to be heard or further business to come before the Board, it was moved by Mr. McGrath and seconded by Mr. Figaski to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m.

 

                                                                        Phyllis A. Vollbrecht
                                                                        Assistant Secretary

 _______________________________________________________________________________

APPROVED:    February 2, 2010

Brian P. McGrath
Richard P. Figaski